The Philosopical Society of Texas
Thomas F. Staley, Moderator
Humanizing the Information Revolution
James H. Billington
Libraries in the Twenty-first Century
Robert S. Martin
Boardwalk over Quicksand: The Challenges Facing an Urban Public Library in the Twenty-first Century
Ramiro S. Salazar
Collections and Collecting
Putting Your Friends on the Shelf
Books About Books: A Personal Journey
Nicholas A. Basbanes
The Handbook of Texas Online: An Engine for Research
“Wear Sunscreen,” or the Documentary Record in the Electronic Environment
David B. Gracy
Officers of the Society
Members of the Society
“Books and Libraries” was the topic of the 166th anniversary
meeting of the Philosophical Society of Texas, held at El
Paso’s historic Camino Real Hotel on December 5–7, 2003.
A total of 240 members, spouses, and guests attended. President J. Sam Moore Jr. organized the program, and Dr. Thomas F. Staley of the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin served as moderator.
by James H. Billington, Ph.D., 13th Librarian of Congress
If a school is a kind of gymnasium for the mind, a library is what the Greeks called Alexandria, a hospital for the soul. However large or small, a library gathers together fragments of what people have known or imagined and gives to others not only a little more knowledge but a little more wholeness. Transfusions of words make connections with collections; and those who have gone before us help us cope with what is to come.
The heart is reading. The vessel is the book. The heartbeat began with man’s search for salvation—the Vedas, the Sutras, the Torah, the Koran. The thirst grew not just for preservation but for circulation of stories that gave meaning to life and coherence to communities.
Compendia of written knowledge are of ancient lineage. Paper, woodblock printing, even movable type originated in the Orient. But the great breakthrough in creating the book, as we know it today almost everywhere in the world, was the replacement of the scroll by the codex in the fourth century a.d. in the eastern Mediterranean region. For the first time, pages were created, codified, and bound like a modern book; and a reader could move around easily in a text, guided by an index, and was able to compare sources that made correlations possible and raised evernew questions. Whereas a scroll could contain only about 1,000 lines, a codex could produce a single artifact large enough to contain the entire Old and New Testaments. Thus was Christianity codified into a Bible that still today is the central element in the faith of the two billion adherents of the largest, if most fractious, of the world’s religions.
A distinctive new civilization developed in the European peninsula of the Eurasian land mass in the course of the millennium that followed. In Western Europe, where the Roman Empire collapsed, culture was preserved and defined less by power than by those Christian codices—handwritten on animal skin in liturgical Latin and preserved in monasteries. Institutions called universities grew up after the recovery of pre-Christian classical learning in twelfth-century Spain, mediated by Muslims and Jews as well as Christians, though the Muslims were often seen as an external enemy and Jews as an internal enemy of Europe as it moved to modernity.
Then came Gutenberg and the modern book—composed in vernacular languages, printed on paper by a press with movable type in large editions, reaching ever more people with increasingly secular content, and creating in the North American extensions of the North European Protestant Reformation and Enlightenment the first and only world civilization created solely in the age of print. That the United States of America, the newest of all world civilizations, has been held together for more than two centuries by the world’s oldest continuously functioning written constitution is in no small measure because its framers were themselves framed by books. Both the first meeting of the Continental Congress in 1774 and the first meeting of the Congress under our new constitution in 1790 physically took place in libraries—in Philadelphia and New York respectively; and the first committee involving both houses of Congress in the new capital of Washington, D.C., was the Joint Committee on the Library of Congress, founded in 1802.
Self-government became self-correctable and federal officials accountable largely thanks to the First Amendment guarantees and through Congress’s free use from the beginning of the Postal Service, formed in 1792 to give constituents free information on the activity of their government. Slowly—but not without sustained and unconscionable injustices to Native and African Americans—the United States grew from a republic into a more inclusive democracy. This evolution was driven inexorably, if at times subconsciously, by the realization that the dynamism of a continent-wide free society drawn from many strains depended on more people having access to more knowledge to be used in more ways. The quintessential expression of this ideal is our amazing public library system, for which we must specially thank Justin Morrill in the Congress, Andrew Carnegie in the private sector, and above all thousands of dedicated librarians throughout America, whom one of my predecessors, Archibald MacLeish, called our “sentinels of liberty.” It is appropriate here to pay special tribute to another of my New England predecessors, Herbert Putnam, who came to the Library of Congress from the Boston Public Library.
American libraries share with American society a tradition of adding without subtracting. New immigrants to America do not evict old inhabitants; and they do not reject but rather renew old institutions. In like manner, new books do not generally replace old ones in libraries. Books that succeed and often contradict each other sit peacefully next to each other on the shelves, just as readers who disagree work peacefully next to one another in the reading rooms.
But the basic challenge now facing American libraries, and Zmerican society more generally today, is whether adding electronics means subtracting books—and losing in the process the values of the book culture that made democracy and the responsible use of freedom possible in the first place. We are, in short, faced with the greatest upheaval in the transmission of knowledge since the invention of the printing press: the electronic onslaught of multimedia-based, digital communication. It bypasses the traditional limits of time and space and raises the haunting question of whether libraries—those historic houses of refuge for reading, those temples of pluralism and seedbeds of humanism—can continue to serve as hospitals for the soul in a medium that so far basically markets commodities for the body?
To use the language of cyberspeak: Is this post-Gutenberg world that is becoming hominized (that is to say, brought under the control of an individual with a keyboard and screen) also becoming dehumanized no longer serving worthy human ends)? Is communication replacing community? Are the new digital enhancements deepening social inequality by disproportionately favoring those who already have the money and education to use them? And, above all, is virtual reality displacing real virtue?
Public libraries, by their nature, have constructive answers to all these questions, and American libraries have already prepared themselves by bringing the new electronics more seamlessly and systematically into their traditional services than have many other public institutions.
Let me briefly describe how the Library of Congress has been working for more than a decade now to help meet these challenges and perform its traditional historic functions of acquiring, preserving, processing, and making accessible materials in the new digital age.
The Library of Congress assumed the broad functions of a true national library in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when it acquired the mint record of American creativity through copyright deposit, gathered most papers of the presidents up to Hoover, collected unparalleled records of Native and African American culture, assumed most of the burden of cataloging for the library system as a whole, and produced free materials nationwide for the blind and physically handicapped.
Now the future direction of the Library of Congress, beyond electronic cataloging, in producing services for the digital age emerged from a series of twelve forums that we coordinated with thousands of librarians all over the country in 1988. From these came the idea for the American Memory pilot project with CD ROMS in forty-four schools and libraries across the country in the early 1990s. Then, of course, came the explosion of the Internet, and American Memory was amplified in the late 1990s into a National Digital Library, which, by the end of 2000, had put seven million items of American history and culture on-line. Just as the Library of Congress had traditionally lent other American libraries books through interlibrary loans free of charge, we were now providing digitized versions of our massive and often one-of-a-kind special collections free of charge to libraries everywhere.
We used part of the private money that largely funded this program to subsidize the addition of unique American historical materials from thirty-seven other institutions, libraries, and repositories from all over America to the American Memory Web site. We were trying to offer one-of-akind primary materials of broad interest and importance from special collections, which only a few had had access to and only in a special place, to a broader audience, but at the same time into the world of books, since American Memory was designed as an archival transfer and bridge to other libraries. We are trying to help bridge the resource gap between major repositories and local libraries; to blend old material into the new technology; and to provide memory for an inherently ephemeral medium that is forever updating information and erasing previous drafts.
What was new for the Library of Congress was the assumption of a broad and nationwide educational function in an institution previously focused on serving the Congress, the government, the scholarly community, and the broader public, mainly as a library of last resort.
American libraries have always served as local centers of lifelong learning. So a more active role for the national library was fully in keeping with the growing bipartisan recognition in political Washington that better education is essential for dealing with almost all our national and international problems. By raising large amounts of private, philanthropic money for the first time in the Library’s history, we were able to sustain the historical American library tradition of providing to the public even this expensive new type of material free of charge.
With the acceleration of technological change and the deepening of the educational crisis in the 1990s, it has become clear that three separate, sequential needs must be met if American libraries are to sustain their historic function of transmitting inert, stored knowledge democratically to a broad and diverse population.
The first is the need to place on the Web educational content that is easily accessible, of dependable quality, and free of charge for everyone.
Second is the need to provide the hardware and software that can deliver this positive content to public institutions like libraries and schools, where everyone can access them freely in local communities everywhere.
Third, there must be human mediators within those public institutions who can serve the special needs of a community and help integrate the new on-line knowledge with the older wisdom in books.
Only the second and the most impersonal of these needs has begun to be met. Both public and private funders in America have been relatively generous in equipping public schools and libraries with the hardware and software for new educational efforts. But the humanizing first and third stages that would provide free humanistic content at one end and humane guidance in its use at the other have yet to be seriously subsidized in America.
The Library of Congress has in recent years been trying to address precisely these two areas of national need with additional new programs that reach beyond our original National Digital Library Program.
For the first stage of generating positive free content, Congress, led by Senator Stevens of Alaska, has begun to extend our national program to a global one by providing funds for a project in which the Library of Congress is collaborating with the national libraries of Russia and with other repositories in both countries. We have already digitized and placed on-line nearly 100,000 primary documents that illustrate the parallel experience of these two former adversaries as continent-wide frontier societies, adding bilingual text from our curators. We have started another such project with Spain and are in advanced discussions with two others. Our collaborative multinational projects are becoming more widely accessible through the electronic gateway of the Bibliotheca Universalis. Representatives from the Group of Seven (G7) and six other European countries are coordinating their policies for digitizing primary documents. All thirteen participants have already contributed content for this Web site; and all this should eventually feed into a global on-line library and network.
We are increasingly conscious of the need to help a wider range of people not merely access but creatively use the materials we are digitizing and grow through them. In 1996 we introduced the Learning Page, an interactive Web site that helps teachers integrate digital content from the Library of Congress with common curriculum topics. Last year we introduced americaslibrary.gov, an interactive and child-friendly educational Web site to promote intergenerational reading and storytelling. This prize-winning site logged 100 million page views in its first year, though it has only a small range of images. It is being supported by the first-ever nationwide public service campaign conducted by the Advertising Council on behalf of a library program.
In addition to providing humanizing content at one end of the electronic delivery system, the Library of Congress has also been trying in a small way to help develop human mediators at the other end.
A recent Markle Foundation study highlights the need for a trustworthy public face to mediate the Internet, a real person to go to with problems. For years now, we have been conducting summer institutes for local librarians and teachers with expertise for integrating the new electronic materials with the old books. But ours is only a small stream feeding into an enormous and ever-expanding ocean. The imaginative, recent call of the Digital Promise report by Newt Minow and Larry Grossman could open up new possibilities for this massive national training need if money could be obtained from the forthcoming sales of licenses for the electromagnetic airway spectrum.
Something, in any event, will have to be done to equip fully our libraries with knowledge navigators conversant with both the new technology and the old books. And children within schools must have better access to libraries, to books, and to knowledge navigators than they now have. There is presently only about one school librarian for every 1,000 schoolchildren nationwide.
Our great repositories can do much by sharing on-line more of their rarely seen but appealingly human multimedia and manuscript treasures and also by inviting more librarians and teachers from their localities into their institutions for substantive visits. Those who work in the education trenches can become stimulated and inspired—as our summer institute fellows have been, almost without exception—by seeing the originals of the documents being digitized and talking with their curators.
The manuscript material now available on-line and free from the Library of Congress has direct human interest (Jefferson’s working draft of the Declaration of Independence, with all the corrections; the diaries of Teddy Roosevelt and George Patton; Lincoln’s handwritten speeches; the letters of Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass). The rich ultimedia materials that we now have on-line (like Brady’s Civil War photographs; early Edison movies; panoramic, block-by-block aerial images of American cities in the nineteenth century) appeal to an audiovisually active generation and, at the same time, raise questions that can only be really answered by going back to reading in books.
The role of the librarian has become more, rather than less, important: to help learners of all ages make connections between print and electronic materials as well as to help navigate through the sea of illiterate chatter, unreliable “infotainment,” and gratuitous sex and violence that is proliferating and that many say is the only real profit-making mode on the Internet. The Internet tends to feed upon itself rather than independently validate the material it transmits. You may have seen the lines making the rounds of library e-mail: “A Zen librarian searched for ‘nothing’ on the Internet and retrieved 28 million matches.”
The Library of Congress is trying to help develop librarianship for the new era through varied programs that, like the Internet itself, are inherently cooperative and networked activities. I am glad to be speaking with all of you. We will all have to be working much more interactively together.
Our Collaborative Digital Reference Service now available worldwide twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The first question asked on it a year ago came from a Londoner seeking information on Byzantine cooking. It was routed through a Library of Congress file server and answered in a few hours by a librarian in Santa Monica, California.
We have two programs that have begun to display tables of contents on the Web—throwing open the door to those who browse the Internet for information as well as those who use our on-line public access catalog. One program is an enhancement of the Library’s Electronic Cataloging in Publication Program. We now enter some tables of contents directly from the electronic galleys into the on-line bibliographic record without having to rekey the data. A second program scans and provides the tables from already printed publications, encouraging catalogers and reference librarians to decide which are most broadly important.
We have also set up a project to link Library of Congress catalog records with the full-text electronic versions of many social service monographic series of the working paper type, such as those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. A fourth new program will provide full on-line information about new books (including jacket blurbs, summary, sample text, and author information).
Finally, the Library of Congress has initiated a project to identify those international Web resources that are of most value to researchers and scholars. When completed, the project will produce an international homepage with pointers to reliable on-line resources for all of the nations of the world. By mid-September, portals for twenty countries will be available to users worldwide.
By far the most difficult new challenge looming for librarianship will be preserving and providing access to “born-digital” materials, that swelling mass of material that appears only in electronic form. We have defined our task at the Library of Congress in recent years as “getting the champagne out of the bottle.” But here the problem of capturing bubbles is another matter. Digital material and the technology to use it are constantly changing and evanescent. The average life of a Web site is only about seventy-five days, and a growing body of important material has already been lost forever.
Election 2000 is our first large-scale collection of data-searchable Web sites to be archived and made available on-line. We chose the subject long before the election became so historic. It was conceived by the Library’s specialists and developed in cooperation with the Internet Archive and Compaq Computer. It collected copies of more than 1,000 election-related Web sites, gathering some 2 million megabytes between August 1, 2000, and January 14, 2001, archiving many times a day—and often hourly—in order to record candidate responses to each other and to demonstrate at the same time the dynamic nature of Internet content.
Last year Congress directed a major special appropriation to the Library of Congress to develop and begin implementing cooperatively a national plan with other governmental and private institutions to preserve for future access important born-digital materials.
Congress incidentally deserves great credit for supporting all the work that the Library of Congress is doing to preserve and make accessible the nation’s creative heritage and now much of the world’s knowledge. Consistently for 201 years, on a bipartisan basis, our national legislature has been the greatest patron of a single library in the history of the world.
And in the last decade generous private donors have also helped us in many new ways to get the champagne out of the bottle. Nothing would be possible, however, without our truly dedicated and diversely talented staff. The Library of Congress is doing more work with fewer people than ten years ago. The staff, which is doing it all, as a body and individually, is every bit as great a national treasure as our 121-million-item collection.
Electronic networks must become not just technological pipelines for marketing and “infotainment” but a healthy circulatory system that regenerates all parts of the body of humanity. And that will not be possible without the heart, which is still reading, and the main vessel, which is still the book.
In 2002 we celebrated the twenty-fifth anniversary of our Center for the Book, which is linked with forty-three state centers. As part of the festivities, the Library held the first-ever National Book Festival on Capitol Hill, an all-day, open-air event hosted by Laura Bush.
Without books, the Internet risks becoming a game without a story: the game of mergers, speculations, increasingly violent video games, a surfing game on the surface of life, motion without memory—one of the clinical definitions of insanity.
The United States was built by people who read stories and did not have much time for games. The biblical story was at the core. The first book published in North America was a rhymed version of the Book of Psalms, often sung in its entirety in Puritan worship. It is from sacred stories that written books emerged almost everywhere, and those who forget altogether their own basic stories will have difficulty understanding those of others, as we must in the global age. If we do not listen to other people whispering their prayers today, we may have to meet them tomorrow when they are howling their war cries.
Properly used, the Internet will help scientifically to solve common problems shared by widely dispersed groups in fields like medicine and the environment and, at the same time, to share on-line the primary documents that tell the distinctive stories of different peoples. We may even begin to see the outside world as a series of celebrations rather than just a source of problems.
In Nebraska at one of those forums I mentioned earlier for librarians of the Great Plains states, an old Native American came up to me after a speech I gave in which I described librarians as gatekeepers to knowledge in the information age. He told me that even before the culture of the book came to America, the most experienced member of a tribe preserved the stories that contained the collective memory of its people the way librarians later did. “We did not call him a gatekeeper,” he gently explained. “We called him the dreamkeeper.”
One of the most imaginative of the many uses that libraries across the country have been making of our on-line American Memory materials is to ask students to use them to reconstruct not just the accomplishments but the dreams of some other culture in some other time or place. Electronic technology must be integrated into the world of books—new technology linked with old memories and old values. Above all, there must always be human intermediaries on the spot (teachers, librarians, the local dreamkeepers, as it were) who can encourage curiosity and direct users back to books as they seek answers to the questions raised by fragmentary electronic materials. No machine can, or should, be a surrogate for direct discourse between people.
Readers enter into a kind of discourse with writers and often find that mute witnesses from the past are often better guides to life than talking heads in the present. Alone with a book, the reader’s imagination is free to roam. Boundaries are not set by someone else’s picture on a television screen; thoughts are not drowned out by someone else’s sounds on a boom box.
On the occasion of our bicentennial, we received the greatest monetary gift in our history from John W. Kluge, who has been chairman of the Library’s first national private-sector support group since it was founded a decade ago. With his gift, we are setting up a new and, we hope, catalytic center for advanced study in the human sciences within the Thomas Jefferson Building on Capitol Hill, hoping renew the discourse between thinkers and doers that created America in the first place, bringing more of the life of the mind and spirit into the city of power and politics—a little more Greece, perhaps even a little of Alexandria, into Rome. We will be bringing from all over the world very senior scholars both to range widely in our multiform collections and put things together rather than just take them apart. And we will also be bringing to the center very young scholars who are not yet embarrassed to keep on asking big questions.
Our hope lies in the words of the prophet Joel:
I will pour out my spirit on all mankind . . .
Your old men will dream dreams,
Your young men will see visions.
Some of the best analysts of this new digital revolution have suggested that only artists can predict what the future will bring. So I end by quoting one of the great poets, T. S. Eliot’s famous lament, “Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” But even more, in “Burnt Norton,” Eliot somehow suggests that a mix of blood and electricity might yet redeem the petty materialism of the modern world that he had previously seen only as a wasteland:
The trilling wire in the blood
Sings below inveterate scars
Appeasing long forgotten wars.
The dance along the artery
The circulation of the lymph
Are figured in the drift of stars
Ascend to summer in the tree
We move above the moving tree
In light upon the figured leaf
And hear upon the sodden floor
Below, the boarhound and the boar
Pursue their pattern as before
But reconciled among the stars.
Another poem I like to cite was written by an unknown European priest for a nonexistent Asian audience in the already-dead language of Latin. Somehow these lines suggest to me that whether any of us—we at the Library of Congress or others in the global networks of the future—will be able to find the means and willingness to understand other parts of the world and of the human past, we will still be ennobled by the effort.
When the Jesuit order left China after the most deeply scholarly and the most nearly successful effort in history to build a cultural bridge between that ancient eastern culture and the Christian west, they left behind, as their last legacy, a haunting epitaph:
Move on, voyager,
Congratulate the dead,
console the living,
pray for everyone,
wonder, and be silent.
Wonder and silence—easier for dreamkeepers than image makers. A library, even a small one in a home or a public place takes us out of our noisy, hurry-up, present-minded lives and into what Keats called the world of “silence and slow time.”
For whatever the confusion in our minds and the profusion of our electronic information, diverse things do still come together in a book, just as the hemispheres (east and west, north and south) come together in our single, fragile planet, and the left and right halves of the brain in one human mind. And within that mind, as the greatest poet of the English language reminds us at the end of his last play: “We are”—all of us—“such stuff as dreams are made on.”
One hundred years ago, under the administration and vision of the learned Jesuit Franz Ehrle, the Vatican Library was transformed. Ehrle stands with his contemporary, Antonio Panizzi of the British Library, as the pair of geniuses who created the modern library as we know it today. Under Ehrle, the Vatican Library became one of the best-organized libraries in the world. This brilliant man also brought the Vatican’s great manuscript collections together and acquired the famous Borghese and Barberini collections. It was Ehrle who elevated the scholarly reputation of the Vatican Library, employing manuscript specialists, the scriptores, and initiating major scholarship.
One longs to know Ehrle’s thoughts as he looked at the new century before him, just as we look today at the one we have entered. Ehrle had one great advantage over us: the stability of the transmission of the word. For over 400 years, this transmission of knowledge had changed little, and there were no prospects on the horizon to suggest major upheavals in the library world. Since Gutenberg, Europe had lived in a culture grounded in the book, and Ehrle and his colleagues never had to entertain the prospect of its demise. Today, however, we are told by some that we are the last survivors of the book culture, of the printed word. Ivan Illich, in his brilliant treatise on Hugh of St. Victor’s medieval text, tells us: “The book has now ceased to be the root-metaphor of the age; the screen has taken its place. The alphabetic text has become but one of many modes of encoding something, now called ‘the message.’” Even if Illich is too anxious to call the book peripheral to our age, he poignantly suggests a major shift in the book’s cultural significance. It is appropriate that we ponder today the fate of the book and the library in light of current technological changes.
It is apparent now that the library as an institution is not merely a shrine to knowledge, a source of human wisdom, a repository of texts embracing everything significant in human understanding. It is all this and more; it has now come to be seen as a hub in a complex, expanding information network in which knowledge seems infinite, where it is beyond our conception to imagine Francis Bacon just 500 years ago claiming all knowledge as his domain. Now one feels more affinity with St. Bonaventure when, in defining the absolute, he anticipated cyberspace: an intelligible sphere whose center is everywhere, whose circumference is nowhere. Bonaventure was a man before his time.
In this newer formulation of the library as informational hub, resources seem elastic, exploding periodically as different users tap the potential of the network. Indeed, the “collection” resides not wholly in the assemblage of texts but in this potentiality, which is the function of the rapidly changing technology of information. This change from shrine to hub, and all that it implies, is truly paradigmatic. Today’s library is both a symbol of learning and a center of the technological revolution.
For the next two days, we will review again the role of the library and the book in our culture, as well as the nature of this technological revolution as it affects libraries and learning, and ultimately texts and reading itself. Will these new technologies, with all their innovation and achievement, transform civilization as fundamentally as Gutenberg’s invention of movable type? This is merely one of the questions we will explore at this conference.
Technology is a valuable and integral component in the future of libraries, but we must question whether digitization should overtake the importance of the book and manuscript as physical objects, valuable in their inherent form.
The heart of this matter for me is the particular relationship between the library and the disciplines we study, especially the humanities. There is no reason why Joyce’s Ulysses cannot be called up and read on a server,
as it is “on-line” in several different versions. But there is every reason to read Ulysses in book form. With the physical volume in our hand, we are nevertheless aware of the substantiality, the reality of the work. The book is the reality; there is no virtual reality here. Each page of Ulysses, each line of the page, has a distinctness, a hard reality of its own. Holding the book is a different experience from reading and scrolling on the screen. The medium of the word is not made flesh; it is too fluid, too mobile and volatile, to encourage sustained effort of thought. We can amass facts, but in doing so, are we inhibited from thinking seriously about ideas? Do we not lose that potential quality from reading a book that Alfred Kazin called “the marginal suggestiveness which in a great writer always indicates those unspoken reserves, that silent assessment of life, that can be heard below and beyond the slow marshaling of
Some have argued that digitization will be the demise of special collections, for they question the need for reading rooms when rare books and manuscripts are readily available in digital form on the web. Last spring, at the Ransom Humanities Research Center, we digitized our Gutenberg Bible and made it accessible on the Web. In merely three months, it received over 14.6 million hits. Now, we would not have had anything to digitize without the physical text of the Gutenberg Bible, and yet we would not have been able to reach 14.6 million people had the book not been available in digital form. We could not have had one without the other—the text first and then the technology, in that order. We must bring both together, however. There will always be a place for physical archives and manuscripts in our special collections, and the future of books and libraries certainly includes digitization as a large component. We must find ways to integrate the use of the physical and digital forms; we must make these modes function together in a complementary manner. And, as Jerome McGann argued not too long ago in the Chronicle of Higher Education, we must rely on the book to ease the transition into a digital age. He says:
Because the book has been our simulation machine of choice for centuries, we need to study and understand it now more than ever—not as a place of retreat, but as a profound source, and resource—at a moment when we are trying to design and control digital simulation tools. . . . The passage into digital culture should be made—can only be made, in my opinion—through a reengagement with print culture. It must and will be so because, like Aeneas passing from Troy to Latium, we cannot leave our household gods behind.
I believe that the past and the present can exist harmoniously in special-collections libraries. We must use digital technology to enhance and expand scholarly inquiry. Yet it is only the analogic mind that holds the implacable conviction that each new invention will substitute rather than complement what already exists. Although rare materials will be more accessible to researchers on-line, we must encourage researchers to look to both digital and physical sources for their material to ensure that use of the physical archive, and all the detritus that comes with it, is not entirely abandoned to a digital scan.
There is also another subject that will be discussed today: the book as object. As Joan Winterson has written, “If you love books as objects, as totems, as talismans, as doorways, as genie bottles, as godsends, as living things, then you love them widely. This binding, that paper. Strange company kept. Like women, the most exciting have had a lively past.” The book is indeed more than its covers, and we salute whatever else it has become.
And today we enter the world of the book, the world of libraries, and the world of new avenues of information.
I am truly honored to be here today and to have the privilege of representing both the American Library Association and the El Paso Public Library, two organizations that have helped to shape my life by showing me how essential libraries and literacy are to an effective democracy. I want to personally thank Sam Moore, your president, for choosing the topic “Books and Libraries” as the theme for this annual meeting and for his kind invitation to speak on several of the key issues facing libraries today.
I would like to begin my speech by taking you on a little trip into the future as we contemplate some trends that libraries face. This story comes from the book A Library for All Times, published by the Swedish National Council for Cultural Affairs:
It is nighttime in Malmö, Sweden, in the year 2010. Even though it is after midnight, lights shine through the windows of the big library. For the past few years it has stayed open round-the-clock. Plenty of people are here. Self-service is now fully integrated, but there are staff in every section of the building to help with questions, advice and consultations.
Why do people come to the library in the middle of the night? Set work schedules have not only changed, they have disappeared. More and more people are working from home. The number who study here has multiplied many times over.
To get access to reading space, advisory services, equipment and collections, people have to be prepared to come at odd hours of the day. But still they all study, to improve their qualifications and learn new things. They study in their free time and without financial compensation.
The book continues:
In theory, the library should have a bright future. Large libraries have an especially favorable outlook. John Naisbitt was right in his book Megatrends written in 1982 when he coined the term “high tech, high touch.” This means that the more high technology distances us, the more important human and social contacts become.
No one is forced to go to the library. You go voluntarily because it is more enjoyable and rewarding than sitting at home
in front a computer. This Library in Malmö is seen as a huge cathedral of knowledge, with its enormous glass facade facing the park and red brick castle with its historic atmosphere, seating more than 1,000 people in reading corners, newspaper and periodical rooms and at computers.
Does the library in Malmö present an accurate picture of the public library in seven, ten, even twenty years from now? I would like to believe that it does, and I would like to share some thoughts on issues that the American Library Association has identified as important to the future of libraries.
One issue that has been critical to the work of ALA is intellectual freedom. I grew up in a household that fostered the belief that access to books and knowledge is the right of every American. My father, a Marine who had fought in the Korean War, spent many hours during my childhood reading a wide variety of books to me as I sat perched on his lap. Some of his topics were not what my teachers might have chosen—a favorite was the poem “Gunga Din” by Rudyard Kipling—but I will never forget the joy I felt at being so close to my dad while sharing his beloved books. (By the way, I hope that all of you read to your children and grandchildren—they will never forget that experience, and it’s a wonderful way to introduce them to the joy of books.) His favorite subject was American history, and there were many history lessons at the dinner table as my dad attempted to shape my sister and me into young patriots who understood the value of the democracy for which he had fought.
I mention this because I have been accused, along with other members of the ALA, of not being patriotic due to our concerns about the potential for the invasion of privacy in connection with some provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act.
To give you a little background, the USA PATRIOT Act was passed in October of 2001, immediately following the tragic events of September 11. Its primary purpose was “To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.” While all Americans agree that terrorist acts must be stopped, many people did not realize the impact that the PATRIOT Act would have on public libraries and their ability to protect the privacy of the millions of people who use them. Section 215 of the act allows federal authorities who are conducting a foreign intelligence or international terrorism investigation to obtain a court order for access to any tangible item, no matter who holds it, including library loan records and the records of library computer use.
In January of 2003, the American Library Association Council (the ALA’s governing body) passed a resolution calling for changes to the USA PATRIOT Act that would protect the privacy of library users and increase public information accountability on the part of the U.S. Department of Justice. Several bills have been introduced in Congress that could accomplish this.
The Freedom to Read Protection Act, introduced by Congressman Bernie Sanders (I-VT), would amend Section 215 of the act “to exempt bookstores and libraries from orders requiring the production of any tangible things for certain foreign intelligence investigations.” The new legislation would reestablish Americans’ constitutionally protected right to read and access information without government intrusion, while still giving law enforcement tools to fight terrorism domestically and abroad. A duplicate bill has been introduced by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) which, like its predecessor, carries bipartisan support.
The question that may come to mind is this: should anyone be concerned that the FBI is scrutinizing his or her library use? A reporter asked that question of Senator Hutchinson last night, who asked me to respond. I had to say that, under the act, I couldn’t tell you whether the FBI had been to the El Paso Public Library. So the short answer is—not at this point. I can also tell you that the FBI has not invoked the PATRIOT Act anywhere. In fact, a September 18 report by the Washington Post included a statement by Attorney General Ashcroft that, nationwide, “The number of times Section 215 has been used to date is zero.” Nevertheless, libraries have been called “a logical target for surveillance” by the U.S. Justice Department, and the American Library Association is now concerned that national security letters, which are easier to obtain than a court order, are being used to secure information about library use.
I was recently asked to take part in a call-in show for Wisconsin Public Radio on the topic of the USA PATRIOT Act, and I was curious about what callers would say about the act as it affects libraries. The comments ranged from that of a man who said “he didn’t care who knew what he was reading” to that of another who identified himself as a farmer and stated, “The PATRIOT Act is like closing the gate after the horse is out.” I was interested to note that the calls, by a ratio of about 3 to 1, sided with the ALA position on the portion of the act that applies to libraries. Benjamin Franklin, a time-tested American patriot, once said, “They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” The American Library Association and public libraries nationwide are working to protect your privacy, which, we believe, will also help to ensure the safety of our communities.
Another topic that has been of interest to libraries nationwide is the filtering of computers in libraries, following the recent decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the Children’s Internet Protection Act, or CIPA. I was the ALA representative who waited on the steps of the Supreme Court this past June as the court’s very narrow decision was handed down. When I was later interviewed by NBC Nightly News, I attempted to convey the level of concern we librarians feel about the implications of the court’s decision.
While librarians are certainly concerned about the safety of children on the Internet, we are also stalwart in our defense of equal access to information by all. Adult library users, in particular, must be able to see what sites are being blocked and, if needed, to request that the filter be disabled—with the least intrusion into their privacy and the least burden on library service. The court’s ruling assumed that filtering could be turned on and off at will for each user, which at present is not easy to do without expensive customized software.
Other implications for libraries beyond the expense of purchasing the filtering systems are federal funds. When the ruling goes into effect on July 1, 2004, federal funding to libraries will be dependent on providing filtering software to patrons using computers in the library. Therefore, some libraries are considering not accepting federal funds rather than limiting access through the filtering systems now available. This will probably not be an option for those libraries that depend on federal funds for their operation.
Another nationwide issue, which libraries are making efforts to address for the good of all, is the literacy level in our country. A recent literacy study of cities with a population of 255,000 or higher was conducted by the University of Wisconsin–Whitewater earlier this year. Thirteen factors were considered in evaluating the sixty-four cities covered in the study. These factors included education levels, publications, newspapers, libraries, and bookstores. Of the sixty-four cities, El Paso was ranked No. 64 in literacy. This was a stunning announcement for me, coming on the heels of my being elected president-elect of the American Library Association.
However, one of ALA’s primary goals is to promote libraries in helping children and adults develop the skills they need—the ability to read and use computers—because the association understands that the ability to seek and effectively utilize information resources is essential in a global information society. Of course, here locally we feel that the ability to read is essential, and we are working with numerous other local agencies and organizations to provide assistance. Our primary focus is on the book, about which Thomas Staley spoke so eloquently earlier today. We promote books for all ages, beginning with babies who receive board books through Estoy Aprendiendo/I’m Learning. For adults we offer various classes, including computer classes, citizenship classes, and English as a Second Language (ESL) classes. There are many opportunities in each community to assist those who want to learn to read in English and other languages.
Visitors to the El Paso Public Library can enjoy the same experiences as Mr. and Mrs. Juan Rosales. When they retired, they wanted to find an activity to fill their time and to keep them active. They also wanted to fulfill their lifelong dream of becoming U.S. citizens. They started attending free citizenship classes at our Clardy Fox branch, and soon they were able to realize that dream together. They loved the relationship they started with the staff and patrons of Clardy Fox, so they continued attending classes, this time attempting to fulfill another dream: continuing their education. They began attending Clardy Fox’s free GED classes and soon received their GEDs together. Mrs. Rosales has since passed away, but Mr. Rosales is still faithfully attending English as a Second Language (ESL) classes at Clardy Fox almost every weekend.
The book A Library for All Time calls the library a “huge cathedral of knowledge,” and I notice that the Philosophical Society has chosen as its purpose “to provide for the collection and diffusion of knowledge.” Obviously, there is a natural alliance between the Society and libraries, and I am proud that you chose El Paso as a place to celebrate that alliance.
Thomas Jefferson once said, “A democratic society depends upon an informed and educated citizenry.” What are we doing today to educate our citizenry? Where is the only place that everyone can go, free of charge, at any age, to learn? The library, of course. Yet why is it that our nation’s libraries remain underfunded, understaffed, operated on a limited schedule, and even closed permanently in some cases? I believe it is because we, as library stakeholders, are not speaking up enough to defend our libraries. We must advocate for our libraries—at every opportunity. This idea of grassroots advocacy for libraries will be the focus of my presidential year, which begins in June of 2004.
I feel strongly that for the future, our goal as an association must be to take every opportunity to impart information to organizations such as the Philosophical Society so that we can build coalitions for protecting our citizens’ right to privacy, ensuring access to information through print resources as well as on-line, and promoting the services of libraries. In my upcoming presidential year, my advisory committee has agreed to the following vision statement: “Stand Up and Speak Out for Libraries—Turning Passive Support into Educated Action.”
As I mentioned, the focus of my presidential year will be a grassroots advocacy campaign that will mobilize everyone—librarians, library workers, library trustees, Friends, and other supporters—to speak out “loudly and clearly” for libraries.
Within the framework of that campaign I will focus on the issues that we all know are most important to libraries across the country:
Literacy. El Paso may have been 64th out of 64 in the University of Wisconsin study, but there were other cities at the bottom of that list with us. We have work to do to promote literacy!
Equity of access (which builds on the theme of the current ALA president, Carla Hayden). We know that only 51 percent of all households have computers nationwide and that fewer have access to the Internet.
Salaries and Status/Recruitment. It’s been said that librarians can’t live on love alone, so we must improve salaries in order to recruit new librarians.
International Relations—Rebuilding the Sister Libraries program. I was just down in Guadalajara talking about this, as well as the Campaign for the World’s Libraries.
ALA’s response to the CIPA decision.
USA PATRIOT Act / Freedom to Read Protection Act
This is just a brief overview of my vision for my presidential year. Many people are working with me to make the vision happen, and I invite you to join in the fun! Together I believe we can make a difference for libraries, by standing up and speaking out on the national, state, and local level about the value of libraries in our communities.